HARMONIZING UNIVERSITY ENGLISH INSTRUCTION WITH STUDENT PREFERENCES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PEDAGOGICAL ALIGNMENT IN EFL CONTEXTS

Penulis

  • Novy Yuliyanti Universitas Al-Khairiyah
  • Romadhon Romadhon Politeknik Piksi Input Serang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i2.1180

Kata Kunci:

English language pedagogy, teaching methodologies, student perspectives, pedagogical alignment

Abstrak

         Despite the global importance of English, many university students still struggle to achieve expected English proficiency. This study explores the gap between lecturer teaching methods and student learning preferences in English courses at a university in Cilegon, Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach based on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Affective Filter Theory, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 students and 5 lecturers. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke. The findings show a clear mismatch between teaching methods and student preferences. While 80% of lecturers used theory-focused teaching, 87% of students preferred practical and communicative activities. Differences were also found in the use of technology, where lecturers mainly used digital tools for delivering materials, while students preferred learning through songs and films. These differences increased students’ anxiety about making grammar mistakes. The study shows that learning difficulties are influenced more by teaching approaches than by students’ motivation to learn.

Referensi

Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi?Structured Interviews. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19

Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317

Asrifan, A., & Heriyanti. (2023). What EFL Students Think about Methods Used to Instruct Their Language. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(3), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.3.544-559

Benson, P. (2016). Learner autonomy. In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 339–352). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676203-29

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.

Canagarajah, S. (2014). In Search of a New Paradigm for Teaching English as an International Language. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.166

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=gX1ZDwAAQBAJ

Dardjito, H., Rolls, N., Setiawan, A., & Sumekto, D. R. (2023). Challenges in Reading English Academic Texts for Non-English Major Students of an Indonesian University. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(3), 1290–1308. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.29067

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. In Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108643689

Ghaleb, B. D. S. (2024). Effect of Exam-Focused and Teacher-Centered Education Systems on Students’ Cognitive and Psychological Competencies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2(02), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v2i02.648

Guaña-Moya, J., Arteaga-Alcívar, Y., Criollo-C, S., & Cajamarca-Carrazco, D. (2024). Use of Interactive Technologies to Increase Motivation in University Online Courses. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121406

Halim, N., Kasim, N. A., & Pratiwi, D. F. (2025). Developing Speaking Proficiency in Indonesian EFL Classrooms: a Qualitative Study on Challenges and Solutions. The Academic: English Language Learning Journal, 10(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.52208/aellj.v10i1.1384

Hamid, R. J., Maing, R. A., Rampeng, Muhammad, A. F., & Sahib, N. (2025). Postgraduate EFL instructional models in Indonesia: aligning student perceptions with lecturer rationales. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2590863. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2590863

Hidayat, M. T. (2024). English Language Proficiency and Career Opportunities: Perceptions of Indonesian University Graduates. Language Value, 17(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.7933

Ko?sut, S., & Szumilas, M. (2023). Exploring student engagement in task-based and communicative language classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 13621688231188800. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231188800

Long, M. (2014). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=WlUzBAAAQBAJ

Luo, Z. (2024). A review of Krashen’s input theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26(1), 130–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54097/3fnf5786

Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419

Phuong, H. Y., Tran, L. K. H., & Le, T. T. (2023). Teaching Beliefs as a Dominant Factor Affecting English Instructors’ Choice of Techniques to Teach Young Language Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16331a

Romadhon, R. (2024a). Exploring English for Specific Purpose Students’ Perceptions of Digital Materials in English Language Learning: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 24(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.33830/ptjj.v24i2.5501.2023

Romadhon, R. (2024b). Identifying Students’ English Language Needs: Digital Business Students’ Perspectives. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 5(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v5i2.6831

Saint, M. (2021). Development of a curriculum based on content and language integrated learning and competency-based education for enhancing business English writing ability of undergraduate students [Chulalongkorn University]. In Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD). https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2021.123

Sattarova, M. (2024). A comparative analysis of traditional and modern approaches in language teaching. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 5(09), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.37547/mesmj-V5-I9-31

Ushioda, E., & DÖrnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond Global English: Motivation to Learn Languages in a Multicultural World: Introduction to the Special Issue. Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 451–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407

Yang, G., Sun, W., & Jiang, R. (2022). Interrelationship Amongst University Student Perceived Learning Burnout, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Teacher Emotional Support in China’s English Online Learning Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 829193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829193

Yusupalieva, S. (2024). Developing Students Communicative Competence using Authentic Materials with Information Technologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Technology & Operations Management, 2(2), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.62157/ijietom.v2i2.62

Diterbitkan

2026-07-03

Cara Mengutip

Yuliyanti, N., & Romadhon, R. (2026). HARMONIZING UNIVERSITY ENGLISH INSTRUCTION WITH STUDENT PREFERENCES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PEDAGOGICAL ALIGNMENT IN EFL CONTEXTS. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 11(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i2.1180