THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CANVA IN IMPROVING SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Authors

  • Aulia Maharani Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
  • Fitri Handayani Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
  • Riyen Permata Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i1.1165

Keywords:

Canva, descriptive writing, digital learning tool, writing achievement

Abstract

           This study addresses a research gap in comparative investigations of visual media for teaching descriptive writing at the junior high school level. While previous studies have largely examined Canva in isolation and focused on higher education, limited attention has been given to its effectiveness compared to other visual platforms and across specific writing components. This quasi-experimental study examines the effects of Canva and Pinterest on seventh-grade students’ descriptive writing performance. Forty-four students were selected through purposive sampling and assigned to experimental and control groups. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests assessed by three independent raters using an analytical writing rubric. The findings reveal that students taught using Canva achieved significantly greater improvement than those taught using Pinterest, with a very strong effect size. Canva was particularly effective in supporting idea development and text organization, resulting in higher-quality written products. These results suggest that Canva is a pedagogically effective visual medium for teaching descriptive writing, and its integration through structured writing activities is recommended to enhance students’ writing skills.

 

References

Amanda, M. D., Megawati, F., & Mandarani, V. (2024). Does teaching writing through Canva application assist students’ writing performance? Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 5(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v5i1.21361

Andryanto, Bara, R. V., Abigaill, O., Muchtar, N. A., Apriliani, N., & B, A. M.(2023). Bahan Ajar Interaktif: Canva, Powtoon, Dan Kahoot. (M. Kasmi (ed.)). eurekamediaaksara@gmail.com

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2019). Introduction to Research in Education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. (2015). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Fulcher, G. (2015). Re-examining Language Testing: A Philosophical and Social Inquiry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693644

Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023

Handayani, F., & Handayani, N. (2020). The potential of online writing tools for EFL university students during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of English Education, 6(1), 9–18.

Jewitt, C. (2016). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.

Kusuma, R. (2022). Students’ writing improvement through interactive media. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.56789

Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS and R (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775661

Mayer, R. E. (2019). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

Permata, R. (2022). Students’ Grammatical Problems in Developing the Paragraphs of Argumentative Essay. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 7(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v7i1.563

Royani, K., Sukirlan, M., & Nurweni, A. (2024). Canva-Aided Project-Based Learning to Improve Students’ Writing Achievement. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 07(05), 2912–2918. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i5-52

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryani, L. (2021). Digital literacy and student engagement in EFL classrooms. Journal of ELT Innovation, 8(1), 55–66.

Toba, R., & Komariah, A. (2022). The Students ’ Problems in Writing Descriptive Text at Seventh Grade Students of Smp Negeri 3 Samarinda. 2(1), 14–24.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Weigle, S. C. (2012). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732959

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Maharani, A., Handayani, F., & Permata, R. (2026). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CANVA IN IMPROVING SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 11(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i1.1165