BLOOM TAXONOMY USED BY TEACHER IN LESSON PLAN
Abstract
Taxonomies used in education are referred to as following Bloom's Taxonomy. This study examines the use of Bloom's Taxonomy in the English teacher's lesson plans at the senior high school in East Payakumbuh. Descriptive research is what this study fell under. East Payakumbuh Senior High School served as the research setting. Th participants included English teachers from grades X and XI. As a source of information, the researcher studied official documents. Peer debriefing was employed by the researcher to verify the reliability of the data. The researcher followed the steps Gay suggested for data analysis. There were a few procedures involved in analyzing the descriptive data, including data data managing, reading or memoing, description, classifying, and writing report (2003:239). According to the findings, the English teacher used the cognitive domain the most in lesson plans, specifically C1 (Knowledge) 110 times; the affective domains were A2 (Responding) 6 times; and the psychomotor domains were P3 (Precision) 37 times.
References
Abdelrahman, M. S. H. B. (2014). An analysis of the tenth grade English language textbooks questions in Jordan based on the revised edition of Bloom's taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(18), 139-151.
Arends, R. I. (2003). Learning to Teach (5th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy. London: TinaCarver.
Celce-Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language.
Los Angeles: HarperCollins Publisher.
Gay, L.R, Geoffrey E.M and Peter Airisian. (2011). Educational Research : Competences for
Analysis Application. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Gay, L.R and Airasian. (2000). Educational Research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan .2014. Materi
Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Tahun 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan
Nasional Republik Indonesia No 41 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses
Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Print, M. (1987). Curriculum Development and Design. Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.
Rahman, S. A., & Manaf, N. F. A. (2017). A Critical Analysis of Bloom's Taxonomy in
Teaching Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Malaysia through English
Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 245-256.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language
teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.
Richard, C. J. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of Language Teaching & applied Linguistics.
Malaysia: Library of Congress.
Salkind, N. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology. London: United Kingdom.
Suyono & Haryanto. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Konsep. Bandung: PT
Remaja Rosdakarya Offet.
Tessa, W. (2001). Planning Lesson and Courses. Singapore: University press.
Ulum, Ö. G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of bloom's taxonomy in the
reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for success 4 reading and
writing. The Qualitative Report, 21(9), 1674.
Veeravagu, J. V. J., Muthusamy, C., Marimuthu, R., & Michael, A. S. (2010). Using Bloom’s
taxonomy to gauge students’ reading comprehension performance. Canadian Social
Science, 6(3), 205-212.
Veeravagu, J. V. J., Muthusamy, C., Marimuthu, R., & Michael, A. S. (2010). Using Bloom’s
taxonomy to gauge students’ reading comprehension performance. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 205-212.
Wang, V., & Farmer, L. (2008). Adult Teaching Methods in China and Bloom's Taxonomy. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), n2.
