ENHANCING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH THE GENERATING INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SCHEMATA AND TEXT (GIST) STRATEGY

Authors

  • Afifah Al Adawiyah Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
  • Jaya Nur Iman Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
  • Dita Rizki Anggraini Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i2.1137

Abstract

        Reading comprehension is an important skill for students, but many still have difficulties understanding and interpreting texts effectively. This study aimed to examine the effect of the Generating Interactions between Schemata and Text (GIST) strategy on students’ reading comprehension achievement. The study also explored how the strategy helped students understand texts through summarizing, activating prior knowledge, and discussing ideas collaboratively. A pre-experimental one-group pre-test and post-test design was used involving 32 seventh-grade students at SMP Maitreyawira Palembang. The results showed a significant improvement in students’ post-test scores (M = 74.14, SD = 6.32) compared to their pre-test scores (M = 50.23, SD = 7.11), t(31) = 17.876, p < .001. These findings indicate that the GIST strategy effectively improved students’ reading comprehension. Therefore, the strategy can be used as an alternative teaching method to support reading instruction in English classes.

References

Afryansyah, A., Aisyah, Kasinyo Harto, & Amilda. (2024). Refleksi hasil PISA dan TIMSS di Indonesia: Upaya peningkatan kompetensi literasi siswa madrasah melalui AKMI. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.24505

Anderson, R. C. (2015). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 594–606). International Reading Association.

Astuti, P. (2016). The use of GIST strategy to improve reading comprehension of narrative texts. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 1–8.

Arifin, Z., & Setiawan, A. (2020). The role of schema activation in reading comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 20(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v20i1.23456

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2021). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000475

Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586613

Channa, M., Nordin, Z., Siming, I., & Chandio, A. (2018). Developing Reading Comprehension through Metacognitive Strategies: Insights from Previous Studies. ELT Journal, 8(8), 181. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p181

Cunningham, W. G. (1982). Systematic planning for educational change. Mayfield Publishing.

Dewi, R. S., & Saputra, H. (2023). The effect of GIST strategy on students’ reading comprehension achievement. English Education Journal (EEJ), 14(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v14i2.28945

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.55.3.1

Fauziyah, R. A., & Dari, R. W. (2024). The effectiveness of using GIST strategy toward students' reading comprehension. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 5(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v5i2.3867

García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2022). Decoding and comprehension processes in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000704

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743

Huang, X., Chen, Y., Li, M., & Chen, Q. (2023). The effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL students’ reading comprehension. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069

Jannah, R., Rahimullah, U., Gistituati, N., & Hadiyanto. (2023). Kurikulum Merdeka dalam mempersiapkan generasi digital natives. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i2.15019

Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069

Khoshsima, H., & Rezaeian, A. (2014). The effect of summarizing strategy on reading comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.11

Lestari, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). The use of schema activation strategy in teaching reading comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 11(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v11i1.3456

List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2021). Reading strategies and comprehension outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102018

McNamara, D. S. (2023). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory and interventions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657332

Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a

Mekawati, A. B. T., & Tri W, C. E. (2020). The use of GIST strategy in reading comprehension. English Research Journal: Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts and Culture, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33061/erj.v5i1.4469

Nasima, S. M., et al. (2024). Assessing the pedagogical effectiveness of the web-based CIRC technique to enhance EFL reading comprehension skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2401667

Nation, I. S. P. (2023). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003096078

Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2019). Reading comprehension and its difficulties: A cognitive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103739

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Students’ reading performance. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2023(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881

Oktavianti, I. N., et al. (2026). Students’ attitudes, challenges, and needs in English reading comprehension: Foundations for AI-integrated corpus-based language pedagogy. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01115-7

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1178

Pebriani, M. R., Thamrin, N. R., Darsih, E., & Fadhly, F. Z. (2022). The effect of using GIST strategy on students' reading comprehension. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v5i1.5875

Pratiwi, D., & Setiawan, A. (2023). The role of metacognitive strategies in enhancing students' reading comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 11(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i2.56789

Ramirez-Avila, M. A., & Barreiro, J. C. (2021). The effect of summarizing narrative texts to improve reading comprehension. Frontiers in Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v6i2.11707

Riani, R., & Yasin, B. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension by using GIST (Generating Interaction between Schemata and Text) strategy at the second year students of SMAN 1 Batang Anai Padang Pariaman. Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(1), 86–97.

Siha, A. S. F., Purnomo, A. J., & Fauziati, E. (2025). A Review of Schema Theory in Students’ Reading Comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Generasi Nusantara, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.61787/f8dgb784

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. RAND Reading Study Group Journal, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7249/MR1465

Solihin, R. R., Susanto, T. T. D., Fauziyah, E. P., Yanti, N. V. I., & Ramadhania, A. P. (2024). The efforts of Indonesian government in increasing teacher quality based on PISA result in 2022: A literature review. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 38(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.381.6

Sulistyo, G. H. (2016). English language teaching and research in Indonesia: A review. TEFLIN Journal, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v27i1/1-20

Yuliana, R., & Handayani, D. (2022). The effectiveness of narrative text in improving reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JELTL), 3(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v3i2.2456

Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2023). Research on the influence path of metacognitive reading strategies. Journal of Intelligence, 11(5), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11050078

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.162

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Adawiyah, A. A., Iman, J. N., & Anggraini, D. R. (2026). ENHANCING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH THE GENERATING INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SCHEMATA AND TEXT (GIST) STRATEGY. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 11(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i2.1137